A hierarchy is very efficient. For example, during a crisis, a leader can issue life-saving orders; but it comes with inherent problems. In addition to the equitability issues involved with a hierarchical structure, innovative ideas from the bottom of the hierarchy don’t make their way to the top, creating stagnation. On the other hand, a grassroots approach, where all individuals have equal voice and power, creates a lot of great ideas, but typically lacks the efficiency to be highly productive; especially in a school where teachers can end up with overwhelming administrative responsibilities and “political” concerns in addition to their classroom duties. Dynamic Governance is a sophisticated “both/and” approach to structuring an organization. It makes appropriate use of the efficiency of a hierarchy, yet at specific times the hierarchy dissolves and everyone has an equal voice for making decisions by consent. Dynamic Governance, if instituted adeptly, melts toxicity, and gives everyone the motivation, power, and tools to be highly innovative and productive. It’s truly the best of both worlds.
Renee Owen, Educating the Innovation Generation, Part IV: how Can Schools Create an Innovative Culture. 13 March 2014. Renee Owen is Executive Director of The Rainbow Community School in Asheville, North Carolina, (Formerly the Mountain School, established in 1977). Rainbow emphasizes Seven Domains: Spiritual, Mental, Creative, Emotional, Social, Natural, and Physical which represent the colors of the rainbow.